登录窗口
作者登录 审稿登录 编辑登录 读者登录
订阅 | 旧版入口 | English
 
  • 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 作者投稿
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
  • 过刊目录
###
DOI:10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20211007001
中国科学院院刊:2021,36(10):1226-1234
查看/发表评论     过刊浏览    高级检索     HTML
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
下载全文
促进智库研究的“六个转变”
潘教峰1,2, 张凤1,2, 鲁晓1
(1.中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190;2.中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049)
Promoting “Six Transitions” in Think Tank Research
PAN Jiaofeng1,2, ZHANG Feng1,2, LU Xiao1
(1.Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;2.School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 2234次   下载 2215次
    修订日期:2021-10-12
中文摘要: 文章分析国内外智库研究的现状和特点,提出在中国特色新型智库建设迈向高质量发展新阶段的时代背景下,智库研究需要实现“六个转变”——从经验式向科学化转变,从零散式向系统性转变,从随机式向规范性转变,从偏学术型向学术实践型转变,从静态向稳态转变,从学科单一向融合贯通转变。文章深入阐释了如何以智库双螺旋法为基本理论方法范式,促进智库研究实现“六个转变”,并进一步揭示了智库双螺旋法在推动智库研究科学化发展上的价值意义。
中文关键词: 智库研究  智库双螺旋法  "六个转变"
Abstract:The article analyzed the current characteristics and situation of think tank research both domestically and internationally, and raised the ideas that think tank research need to achieve "six transitions" especially under the background of think tank construction agenda of Chinese government, which is to transition from empirical to scientific research, from discrete to systematic approach, from randomness to normativeness, from pure academic-oriented to integrative studies fitting both academic and practical requirements, from static to stable style, and from a single discipline basis to comprehensive and consistent research. Based on long-term experiences and practices in policy and strategic research, Prof. PAN Jiaofeng at the Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASISD) proposed a new method for think tank research, namely the think tank double helix methodology. The methodology comprises of two cycles:the external cycle featuring three stages-the deduction of research question, the comprehensive research, and the regression to the real problem, and the internal iterative cycle involving two mutually embedded helixes-DIIS at the process level and MIPS at the inherent logic level. The DIIS helix emphasizes that the research must follow a step-wise process beginning at data (D) collection, and proceeding to information (I) revelation, intelligence (I) synthesis, and arriving at solution (S) formation; while MIPS helix stresses that the content of the research must follow a logical pathway starting from mechanism (M) analysis, developing to impact (I) analysis and policy (P) analysis, and finally arriving at solution (S) formation. In the booming field of think tank research, the double helix methodology represents a fundamental work to advance the scientific development of think tank research, given that it provides a pathway to promote the "six transitions" as mentioned above and to establish think tank research as a science. The methodology would provide think tank research with a new way of thinking, practice guidelines, and operational approach, hence establishing a research paradigm for think tank research. As a new way of thinking, it aims at eliminating the scattered, fragmented and simplified style of thinking, giving way to a more holistic and systematic mindset. As a practice guideline, it offers a global, panoramic and full-process reference for think tank research, covering both the process and the content of the research. As an operational approach, it plays an instrumental role in gathering the wisdom of experts and scholars with various academic backgrounds and experiences, and comprehensively integrating methods and tools of different types. Therefore, this article explains in detail about how to utilize the think tank double helix methodology as the basic theoretical and methodological paradigm, so as to promote the "six transitions", and reveals the value and significance of the think tank double helix methodology in promoting the scientific development of think tank research.
keywords: think tank research  think tank double helix methodology  six transitions
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:国家高端智库建设试点专项,中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院重点培育项目(E1X07916)
作者单位
潘教峰1,2 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190
中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049 
张凤1,2 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190
中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049 
鲁晓1* 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190 
Author NameAffiliation
PAN Jiaofeng1,2 Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 
ZHANG Feng1,2 Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 
LU Xiao1* Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
引用文本:
潘教峰,张凤,鲁晓.促进智库研究的“六个转变”[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36(10):1226-1234.
PAN Jiaofeng,ZHANG Feng,LU Xiao.Promoting “Six Transitions” in Think Tank Research[J].Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2021,36(10):1226-1234.
 
 
您是第35089469位访问者!
1996-2021 中国科学院版本所有 备案序号: 京ICP备05002857
地址:北京三里河路52号 邮编 100864 Email:bulletin@cashq.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司