登录窗口
作者登录 审稿登录 编辑登录 读者登录
订阅 | 旧版入口 | English
 
  • 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 作者投稿
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
  • 过刊目录
###
DOI:10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20220108001
中国科学院院刊:2022,37(5):661-673
查看/发表评论     过刊浏览    高级检索     HTML
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
下载全文
发展高风险高回报研究的科技政策机制
曹玲静1,2, 张志强*1,2
(1.中国科学院成都文献情报中心 成都 610041;2.中国科学院大学 经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190)
Developing Science and Technology Policies for High Risk-High Reward Research
CAO Lingjing1,2, ZHANG Zhiqiang*1,2
(1.Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China;2.Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of ChineseAcademy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 1451次   下载 1846次
投稿时间:2022-04-26    
中文摘要: 高风险高回报(HRHR)研究是指科学研究问题的挑战性或失败风险很高但其成功后的突破性、变革性和原创性鲜明的科学研究类型,其体现科技原始创新能力,致力于产出重大科学发现和技术突破成果,有利于加快提升国家科技创新核心竞争力,这方面的理论与方法研究有助于完善科技政策。深入洞明国际上该类研究的发展背景、概念内涵及特征,探讨构建“决策-资助-执行”三位一体的HRHR研究管理体系,并以国际典型科研机构的HRHR研究项目为例,系统分析、比较与归纳改进的同行评议、项目经理制和去评审化等代表性学术评议机制的基本原理、评审流程及优缺点等,可以为完善国家科研管理政策提供依据。借鉴国外HRHR研究项目资助的有益经验提出建议:制定促进HRHR研究的科技管理政策;完善遴选HRHR研究的项目评议机制;营造激励HRHR研究的卓越学术生态。
中文关键词: 高风险高回报研究  突破性创新  原始创新  科研资助  科技政策  学术评议
Abstract:High Risk-High Reward (HRHR) research refers to scientific research with high risk of failure but characterized by breakthrough, innovation and originality. It truly reflects the original innovation ability of science and technology, is committed to bringing major scientific discoveries and technological breakthroughs, and is conducive to accelerating the improvement of national competitiveness in original science and technology. The theoretical and methodological research in this area will help improve science and technology policies. On the basis of clarifying its development background, conceptual connotation and characteristics, this paper discusses the construction of a "decision-fundingimplementation" model of HRHR research and management system. By taking the HRHR projects of typical international scientific research institutions as case studies, it systematically analyzes, compares and summarizes the basic principles, review processes, advantages and disadvantages of representative academic review mechanisms such as peer-review model, project-manager model, and de-review model. Based on the innovation experience of foreign HRHR research projects, some suggestions are put forward:formulate HRHR research funding policies to promote original innovation; improve the academic review mechanism for selecting HRHR research; and create an excellent academic ecology that stimulates HRHR research development.
keywords: High Risk-High Reward (HRHR)  transformative innovation  original innovation  science funding  science and technology policy  academic review
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:中国科学院政策研究课题(ZYS-2021-03)
作者单位
曹玲静 中国科学院成都文献情报中心 成都 610041
中国科学院大学 经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190 
张志强* 中国科学院成都文献情报中心 成都 610041
中国科学院大学 经济与管理学院图书情报与档案管理系 北京 100190 
Author NameAffiliation
CAO Lingjing Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of ChineseAcademy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
ZHANG Zhiqiang* Chengdu Library and Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
Department of Library, Information and Archives Management, School of Economics and Management, University of ChineseAcademy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
引用文本:
曹玲静,张志强*.发展高风险高回报研究的科技政策机制[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(5):661-673.
CAO Lingjing,ZHANG Zhiqiang*.Developing Science and Technology Policies for High Risk-High Reward Research[J].Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2022,37(5):661-673.
 
 
您是第34732245位访问者!
1996-2021 中国科学院版本所有 备案序号: 京ICP备05002857
地址:北京三里河路52号 邮编 100864 Email:bulletin@cashq.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司