(1.Institute for Global Innovation Studies, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;2.School of Geographic Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)
Abstract:Drawing on the essence of global science and technology innovation (STI) centers, this study evaluates the level of science and technology innovation of 140 cities worldwide by constructing a five forces assessment model of global STI centers, which includes 33 indicators in 5 dimensions. The analysis reveals a significant tripartite pattern of development in global STI centers across Europe, North America, and the Asia-Pacific region. However, divergent patterns emerge in the development of these centers across different regions. Notably, global STI centers in various regions follow distinct development trajectories. At the national level, the United States and China lead the development of global STI centers, with the former demonstrating comprehensive leadership across various dimensions. In contrast, China’s centers exhibit notable deficiencies in attracting and nurturing top-tier talent, cultivating leading subjects in science and technology, and building an innovative environment. Lastly, this study proposes targeted strategies and recommendations for establishing a globally significant talent hub, strengthening national strategic scientific and technological capabilities, and optimizing the supportive environment for scientific and technological innovation based on the shortcomings and challenges faced by China’s STI centers.
引用文本:
杜德斌,段德忠,张强,于英杰,郭卫东,江紫薇,李希雅,苏晗,李祺祥,陈毓玲,石志浩,李海侨,喻思齐,丁浚峰,王凯欣,惠奕涵.全球科技创新中心发展态势[J].中国科学院院刊,2024,39(9):1647-1659.
DU Debin,DUAN Dezhong,ZHANG Qiang,YU Yingjie,GUO Weidong,JIANG Ziwei,LI Xiya,SU Han,LI Qixiang,CHEN Yuling,SHI Zhihao,LI Haiqiao,YU Siqi,DING Junfeng,WANG Kaixin,HUI Yihan.Development pattern of global science and technology innovation centers[J].Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2024,39(9):1647-1659.