Abstract:The United States, Europe, and China have adopted completely different technological development paths in the era of artificial intelligence innovation, forming a model division of “development-driven governance”, “stringent governance framework”, and “coordinated governance model” The United States and Europe have respectively set strategic goals as “maintaining technological hegemony” and “competing for the soft power of international rules”, forming an interactive model in which institutional supervision and industry independence parallel, and cooperation needs and policy divergence coexist. China has contributed a unique technological governance logic of “people-oriented” and “moral-oriented”. Faced with the current technological “window of opportunity”, China should adopt two paths: reshaping the rules and strategic policy innovation, further enhancing its leading position in the development of global technology industries and its dominance in the formulation of international standards.