登录窗口
作者登录 审稿登录 编辑登录 读者登录
订阅 | 旧版入口 | English
 
  • 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 作者投稿
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
  • 过刊目录
###
DOI:10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2016.01.007
中国科学院院刊:2016,31(1):59-69
查看/发表评论     过刊浏览    高级检索     HTML
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
下载全文
中国城市化、农业发展、生态安全和自然岸线格局的空间解析
王亚飞1,2, 郭锐3,1,2, 樊杰1,4
(1.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 北京 100101;2.中国科学院大学 北京 100049;3.1 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 北京 100101;4.中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室 北京 100101)
Analysis on Spatial Development Structure of Pattern of Urbanization, Agricultural Development, Ecological Security, and Natural Coastline in China
Wang Yafei1,2, Guo Rui3,1,2, Fan Jie1,4
(1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;3.1 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;4.Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 4266次   下载 3630次
投稿时间:2015-12-21    
中文摘要: 文章从中国城市化、农业发展、生态安全和自然岸线格局的空间界定出发,基于国土空间开发适宜性评价、主体功能区划、资源环境承载状态评价及其相互交叉分析,对城市化、农业发展、生态安全和自然岸线格局的空间结构进行解析。通过分析城市化、农业发展、生态安全和自然岸线格局的国土空间开发适宜程度、主体功能定位、资源环境承载状态的数量结构、空间形态结构以及成因分析,并结合与国家层面相应结构的比较研究,给出了中国城市化、农业发展、生态安全和自然岸线格局的空间格局特征。研究表明:自然岸线格局区域的人均 GDP、人口密度、国土开发强度、城市化比重等指标都远高于城市化格局区域,是“四大格局”中全国经济和人口集聚程度最高的区域。城市化格局首选开发适宜度高的区域,而农业发展格局和生态安全格局具有明显保护指向性,其大部分区域为适宜度低的区域。城市化格局、农业发展格局、生态安全格局和自然岸线格局的资源环境超载状况均较为严重。
中文关键词: 城市化格局  农业发展格局  生态安全格局  自然岸线格局  主体功能区  国土开发适宜度  资源环境承载能力  空间解析
Abstract:From the perspectives of the spatial scope definition of urbanization, agricultural development, ecological security, and natural coastline in China, this paper analytically explores the spatial pattern of urbanization, agricultural development, ecological security, and natural coastline, on the basis of crosstab analysis of spatial development suitability, Major Function-Oriented Zoning(MFOZ) and the evaluation of resources and environment carrying capacity. It further concludes the spatial features of the above four patterns through the analysis of quantitative structure, spatial pattern and causes of their resources and environment carrying capacity, spatial development suitability and MFOZ, in conjunction with the comparative study with counterpart structures at national level. The research demonstrates: regions of natural coastline pattern considerably surpass those of urbanization pattern in the indicator-wise, such as percapita GDP, population density, land development intensity, urbanization proportion and alike, which indicates the characteristic of “T shaped” spatial structure is conspicuous in national level. Beyond that, this pattern group tops all the other three in the sense of regional economic and demographic concentration degree, where the aggregation will further continue in the future. As a result, these regions develop as the preferred priority to build megalopolis, and as the leading regions to help promote national competitiveness and to participate in the global competition. Urbanization pattern prefers priority to the regions hold the high level of development suitability, while the agricultural development and ecological security patterns are apparently more targeted at protection issues, where most of the regions bears a low level of development suitability. Specifically speaking, the ecological security pattern reflects the most significant directivity, as almost 95 percent of its total land is less suitable for development, versus half of the regions of agricultural development pattern. Besides, the land of lower development suitability is occupied by urbanized areas to a relatively high degree in the regions of urbanization pattern, raising the cost of land development and construction. As to resources and environment overloading state, all four patterns have seriously crossed the bottom-line, while the highest portion of overloading area was found in the ecological security pattern and the maximum population overloaded proportion in the urbanization pattern. To further study a few more issues, the urbanization and agricultural development patterns commonly face the problem of water resource, and the environmental problem constitutes the core concern of overloading problem in the urbanization and natural coastline patterns. The principle cause of overloading is attributed to a land shortage and environmental degradation in the ecological security pattern.
keywords: urbanization pattern  agricultural development pattern  ecological security pattern  natural coastline pattern  Major Function- Oriented Zoning(MFOZ)  resources and environment carrying capacity  spatial development suitability  spatial analysis
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:中科院科技战略咨询研究院重大咨询项目(Y02015005)、中科院STS项目(KFJ-EWSTS-089),国家自然科学基金重点项目(40830741)
作者单位E-mail
王亚飞 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 北京 100101
中国科学院大学 北京 100049 
 
郭锐 1 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 北京 100101
中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 北京 100101
中国科学院大学 北京 100049 
fanj@igsnrr.ac.cn 
樊杰 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 北京 100101
中国科学院区域可持续发展分析与模拟重点实验室 北京 100101 
 
Author NameAffiliationE-mail
Wang Yafei Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 
 
Guo Rui 1 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 
fanj@igsnrr.ac.cn 
Fan Jie Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China 
 
引用文本:
王亚飞,郭锐,樊杰.中国城市化、农业发展、生态安全和自然岸线格局的空间解析[J].中国科学院院刊,2016,31(1):59-69.
Wang Yafei,Guo Rui,Fan Jie.Analysis on Spatial Development Structure of Pattern of Urbanization, Agricultural Development, Ecological Security, and Natural Coastline in China[J].Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2016,31(1):59-69.
 
 
您是第40432791位访问者!
1996-2021 中国科学院版本所有 备案序号: 京ICP备05002857
地址:北京三里河路52号 邮编 100864 Email:bulletin@cashq.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司