登录窗口
作者登录 审稿登录 编辑登录 读者登录
订阅 | 旧版入口 | English
 
  • 首页
  • 期刊简介
  • 编委会
  • 作者投稿
  • 订阅指南
  • 联系我们
  • 过刊目录
###
DOI:10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20240129002
中国科学院院刊:2024,39(8):1389-1400
查看/发表评论     过刊浏览    高级检索     HTML
←前一篇   |   后一篇→
本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
下载全文
权威与激励:中央和地方政府促进科研设施与仪器开放共享的政策比较
游玎怡1, 肖帅2, 张辰2, 文皓3, 宋大成4,5, 郭润桐4,5, 温珂4,5, 魏强2, 余枝2, 李天鸣2
(1.四川大学 公共管理学院 成都 610065;2.中国科学院科技创新发展中心 北京 100190;3.中国科学院 发展规划局 北京 100864;4.中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049;5.中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190)
Authority vs. incentives: Comparison of central and local government policies to promote openness of scientific facilities and instruments
YOU Dingyi1, XIAO Shuai2, ZHANG Chen2, WEN Hao3, SONG Dacheng4,5, GUO Runtong4,5, WEN Ke4,5, WEI Qiang2, YU Zhi2, LI Tianming2
(1.School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China;2.Science and Technology Innovation and Development Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;3.Bureau of Development and Planning, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864, China;4.School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;5.Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China)
摘要
图/表
参考文献
相似文献
本文已被:浏览 459次   下载 229次
投稿时间:2024-07-22    
中文摘要: 科研设施与仪器的开放共享是开放科学的题中之意,旨在提高科技资源使用效率、促进更多成果产出。政策是推动科研设施仪器开放共享的关键因素,但目前对相关政策的研究分析却较少。文章在时间—工具框架下对23份中央政策文件和65份省级政策文件进行了文本分析,凝练出强制开放和查重评议两类权威型政策工具,以及评价考核、正面和负面支付等多种激励型政策工具,揭示了省级政府沿袭和加码中央政策工具的现状。结合对高校院所调研访谈中发现的问题,提出强化使用率和产出率考核导向、分级开展查重评议、联动科研经费和开放共享、加强人才队伍建设等4点政策建议。
中文关键词: 科研设施与仪器  权威型政策工具  激励型政策工具  中央政府  地方政府
Abstract:The openness of scientific facilities and instruments is a part of open science, which can help improve the efficiency of resource utilization and promote more research outputs. Policies is a key driving force for the openness, but studies to analyze such policies are still lackluster. This study conducted a text analysis of 23 central government policies and 65 local government policies in the time-tool framework, and found two types of authority tools: mandatory openness and duplicate review, as well as various incentive tools to give positive and negative payment. It reveals that provincial governments follow and tighten the screws of authority tools from the central government, and meanwhile, carry out policy innovation in incentive tools. Based on the investigation of practice in the openness of scientific facilities and instruments, this study proposes four policy suggestions: paying more attention to the utilization rate and outputs, improving the institutional design of duplicate review at different levels, linking research funding to open sharing, and promoting talent development.
keywords: scientific facilities and instruments  authority policy tool  incentive policy tool  central government  local governments
文章编号:     中图分类号:    文献标志码:
基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年项目(72304264),中国科学院科技创新发展中心项目(2022KCZX08),中国博士后科学基金项目(2022M723220)
作者单位
游玎怡1 四川大学 公共管理学院 成都 610065 
肖帅2 中国科学院科技创新发展中心 北京 100190 
张辰2 中国科学院科技创新发展中心 北京 100190 
文皓3 中国科学院 发展规划局 北京 100864 
宋大成4,5 中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049
中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190 
郭润桐4,5 中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049
中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190 
温珂4,5* 中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049
中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190 
魏强2 中国科学院科技创新发展中心 北京 100190 
余枝2 中国科学院科技创新发展中心 北京 100190 
李天鸣2 中国科学院科技创新发展中心 北京 100190 
Author NameAffiliation
YOU Dingyi1 School of Public Administration, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China 
XIAO Shuai2 Science and Technology Innovation and Development Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
ZHANG Chen2 Science and Technology Innovation and Development Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
WEN Hao3 Bureau of Development and Planning, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864, China 
SONG Dacheng4,5 School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
GUO Runtong4,5 School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
WEN Ke4,5* School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
WEI Qiang2 Science and Technology Innovation and Development Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
YU Zhi2 Science and Technology Innovation and Development Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
LI Tianming2 Science and Technology Innovation and Development Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China 
引用文本:
游玎怡,肖帅,张辰,文皓,宋大成,郭润桐,温珂,魏强,余枝,李天鸣.权威与激励:中央和地方政府促进科研设施与仪器开放共享的政策比较[J].中国科学院院刊,2024,39(8):1389-1400.
YOU Dingyi,XIAO Shuai,ZHANG Chen,WEN Hao,SONG Dacheng,GUO Runtong,WEN Ke,WEI Qiang,YU Zhi,LI Tianming.Authority vs. incentives: Comparison of central and local government policies to promote openness of scientific facilities and instruments[J].Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2024,39(8):1389-1400.
 
 
您是第34761581位访问者!
1996-2021 中国科学院版本所有 备案序号: 京ICP备05002857
地址:北京三里河路52号 邮编 100864 Email:bulletin@cashq.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司